Keeping an eye on the hottest in film and television.

The Bitch Report: How "Harold and Kumar" Subverts Racial Paradigms

Harold and Kumar 1

["The Bitch Report" is a weekly column written for Always Watching by Angie J. Han. You can find more of Angie's writing at her personal blog, Bitch Happy.] 

If a movie breaks barriers and nobody notices, does it make a difference? In 2002, director Justin Lin tried and failed to prove that America was ready for an Asian-American cast with Better Luck Tomorrow. The hype surrounding the unusual casting actually had the effect of making it difficult to see the characters as anything but a bunch of Asians, and the film was quickly forgotten.

Two years later, a group of Caucasians achieved what Lin couldn’t with Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle, perhaps still the only mainstream American film to feature two Asian-American male leads. Audiences of all stripes laughed and sympathized with the characters without noticing the breakthrough that had just taken place. Which, of course, is precisely what made it so radical.

In honor of the release of Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay today, below are four reasons why Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle might be the most racially subversive pothead comedy you’ve ever seen. 

hkumarlogo

1) "Harold & Kumar" was targeted at a general audience

There’s a reason why most things aimed at “general” audiences feature white, male protagonists—there is a pervasive belief in the entertainment industry that while black people can identify with white characters, or women can relate to “male” problems, white men can’t understand anyone but themselves.

The producers of Harold and Kumar quietly ignored this rule by casting two Asians as drugged out Everymen and expecting that young stoners of all colors would be able to enjoy the film all the same. And they did. The movie performed well enough to give rise to a sequel, and is no more thought of as an “Asian” movie than Superbad is thought of as a “white” movie.

Harold and Kumar 2

2) Harold and Kumar are not defined by their ethnicity...

In the rare instances where Asians actually appear in popular film or television, they tend to be pigeonholed as martial arts masters, or hopeless nerds, or perhaps Westernized young people fighting against their immigrant parents’ old-fashioned, Eastern ways. There’s nothing wrong with any of these roles per se, but when lame stereotypes are the only images that Asians are allowed to project of themselves, it gets frustrating.

In contrast, Harold and Kumar are people first—goofy, lazy, stoned people who also happen to be Asian. When Kumar fights with his dad about his future, it’s not because becoming a doctor is the Indian way but because all parents prefer their children to become successful professionals than dead-end drug addicts. You wouldn’t think that being stereotyped as a pothead would be a step up, but in some weird way, it is.

3) ...But at the same time, the film doesn’t completely ignore race

On the other hand, it would be just as regressive to pretend we live in a post-racial utopia, and Harold & Kumar neatly avoids that trap. As in real life, racism is rarely the focus of the film, but it’s often part of the backdrop. Blatant bigotry shows up long enough to be skewered, as when police arrest a sleeping man for a crime because he’s the only black guy around, but then it steps back into the shadows to let the main plot run its course.

 

4) The Asian guy gets the girl

Is there any figure in mainstream cinema that gets less love than the Asian male? Jet Li, one of the coolest, most badass movie stars of any race, co-starred with the gorgeous Aaliyah in a movie that had “Romeo” in the title and still couldn’t garner more than an awkward hug. Harold, on the other hand, hooks up with his hot Hispanic neighbor in the elevator. It’s perhaps the only time I recall seeing an Asian-American man portrayed as being anything but entirely undesirable. Harold’s no George Clooney, but he’s smart, likeable, and good-looking, and Maria’s lucky to get him.

 

Closing Thoughts

I haven’t seen Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay yet—it hits theatres today—but from the trailers and clips I gather that the story has taken a sharp turn toward racial satire. It looks funny enough, but it makes me a little sad to see the subtlety go. Whereas last time, the pair found themselves in their predicament because of an uncanny craving for hamburgers, this time their story has everything to do with the color of their skin.
 
In the years since Harold & Kumar, Asian-Americans have gained some ground, primarily on the small screen with shows like Lost, Grey’s Anatomy and Cashmere Mafia. There’s still a long way to go—the Asian guy in Eli Stone is exactly like your typical Zen guru but without the difficult accent—but Asian America is steadily becoming normalized. Ironically, the best indication that progress has been made is that it’s barely noticeable—like Harold and Kumar, the best roles blend in, because they read as regular characters.


If you liked this article, you'll probably like these:

You can also hear Dave, Adam, Devindra and Angie review Harold & Kumar Escape from Guanatnamo Bay on the latest episode of The Watchers Podcast.

43 Comments

kumar isn't asian.

kumar isn't asian.

yes he is

india is in asia, south asia

yes he is

what continent is india located?

Asian?

By that rational all Russians should be considered Asians since Russia is the biggest country in all of Asia.

Yes, Asian.

Ummm.... Russians are Asian. Oriental is what the Japanese and Chinese and Korean are.

to say harold and kumar

to say harold and kumar breaks racial barriers is stupid, they are not asian-americans, they are americans. They do not have dual citizenship. They are US citizens. Stop being rascist and labeling them cause of their skin tones. The ONLY reason harold and kumar was so succesfull is cause it was funny! Thats all. Stop expressing your racial observations, it makes you very racist

feh. tell other AMERICANS

feh. tell other AMERICANS that. Americans label pretty much every racial minority in that country. Get over yourself. Harold and Kumar breaks conventional casting procedures. It breaks racial barriers because while watching we hardly think about their race, and it was one of the only mainstream movies that featured two people of different races other then white.

@ dum

First of all 'Asian-American' is a term used to describe Americans of Asian decent not for people that have dual citizenship. Secondly they are labeled based upon the characters they portrayed in the film, which have strong roots in their Asian heritage. Have you even seen the movie? Stop calling people racist for something that is not racist you oversensitive wanker.

indian asians

In the US, the term "asian" usually only refers to folks who are from chinese/korean/japanese ancestry. However, for the rest of the world, Indian's are considered "asian". India is part of the Asian sub-continent. I recall in the 80's (when I came to the US), I had to identify myself as "asian/pacific-islander" in demographic surveys. Now, there is a separate entry for "East Indian" (as opposed to west-indian's who are from the Caribbean). Hope this helps. Angie is right in referring to both Harold and Kumar as "asians". Coincidentally, my best friend is Chinese and I am Indian. My middle name is "Kumar" and his is "Harold". Go figure!

I think you're reading too far into this...

I'm multiracial but I've never really identified as such. I married outside of both my parents' races to a girl who is also a different religion, but we never really identify ourselves as such. Result? No perceived racism or anything like that. Basically racism is often just as much a matter of perception as it is reality. Sure, there are KKK members out there who really are racist, but when someone sees an Asian portrayed as a booksmart achiever in a movie as a race issue that's just stupid. I hate to say it, but many real-life Asians are booksmart achievers :-) It's a cultural fact that Asian parents push their kids to do well in school and go into one of the 'Big 4' careers - medicine, finance, law, or engineering. That's not an unfair stereotype, it's art reflecting reality. That's part of the joke with Kumar's doctor father pushing him into medicine. My wife is Indian, her mom is a doctor, and the same pressure was placed upon her. Is it fair that most villains these days are well to do white guys simply because we're afraid to offend anyone? Basically when we can admit the realities of certain groups - black gangbangers, latin immigrants, nerdy asians, arab terrorists, etc - without being so sensitive as to assume that such representations are meant to characterize ALL blacks, latins, asians, arabs, etc, we'll be in a much better place.

Re: I think you're thinking too far into this...

To quote you Sean: "It's a cultural fact that Asian parents push their kids to do well in school and go into one of the 'Big 4' careers - medicine, finance, law, or engineering." Has this been fact-checked?

stereotype != racism

stereotype != racism (although it can be)

Sean: "but many real-life Asians are booksmart achievers"

A positive stereotype is still a stereotype. For instance, people might stereotype the mentally retarded as kind and openly loving. It is a positive stereotype, and in its attribution of positive characteristics to the entire group it undermines the reality that they get just as angry, can be just as hostile, and be total jerks as anybody else. This is why *any* stereotype is bad - it limits the expected characteristics of a group of people to a much smaller subset of the human condition and fails to acknowledge that they are just that: fully human.

There's lots of real-life Asians who are not booksmart achievers. Why should people expect that they are?

It wasn't easy to get H&K made

I worked for the company (Senator International) that made Harold & Kumar. That script had been going around Hollywood for quite some time and was generally considered to be the funniest comedy writing sample in town, but completely un-makeable due to the two Asian leads. Senator took a chance on it and was widely congratulated for having the balls to go forward with a hilarious, but likely unsuccessful, project. It was incredibly difficult to cast, and it was tough getting financing in place. But in the end, even with the necessary low-budget production, it turned out exactly as we hoped it would: one of the smartest, least patronizing comedies (stoner or otherwise) in quite some time. I haven't worked with Senator (now Mandate) since H&K 1 came out, but I'm very excited to see that H&K 2 has finally been made and released and seems to be garnering a lot of excitement.

india is in asia...

India is in Asia; however I don't like to generalize like that. It doesn't happen with Europeans or North Americans, yet people from African nations are labeled as African. If you are from Asia, you are Asian. If you are from North America, you are Canadian or American (silly in itself as anyone from North or South America should be able to be "American," yet only U.S. citizens are American) If you're from Europe, you identify with you ethnicity or nation, not Europe as a whole. Put a Frenchman and a German in the same group, see how that goes. I have to say that I hate being labeled as Asian as I so often am, I am half Chinese, half Irish. When people ask me what race I am, I reply "Human." Race is stupid, its a human construct and it only exists still because it is a useful tool for discrimination.

Identity by continent

Actually, if you put a German and a Frenchman in say Libya or China, they'll be identified as Europeans first.

cracks me up

Those guys crack me up!

I heard about this on the

I heard about this on the podcast earlier this week and found the link on imdb. Somebody submitted it after all :) Great article

An Asian Male Star Got the Girl 17 years ago

Jason Scott Lee (Bruce Lee) got Lauren Holly (Linda Lee) in Dragon: the Bruce Lee Story released in 1991. Linda was shown to be smitten by Jason shortly after meeting him in college. But, both ended up living together, marrying, having a child, establishing "The Bruce Lee Home" in Hong Kong.

Exactly what I was thinking

It's so funny because I wanted to write about this as well. I love both movies, Harold & Kumar (1) and Better Luck Tomorrow, but the edgy, arthouse drama couldn't grab the same appeal (especially with the terrible and pathetic attempt at marketing it by MTV) as the sly, stoner comedy. It spends time on racial issues but doesn't preach. The subtlety of H&K not wanting to attend the Asian Club party is particularly poignant, and something that may be difficult for some people to fully understand or identify with. It's this subtlety that, for me, raises the first one above the sequel, although general consensus seems to hold the second in more esteem. However, both are great films, and milestones for Asian-Americans in cinema.

The Slanted Screen

Peep this documentary (I sense the author of this blog has). It's a really good start at understanding Asians in the entertainment media (though I feel it did not focus on Indians much, if at all), even going back to the silent era. I'm just glad to see Kal Penn doing diverse projects. The Namesake was fantastic, but overlooked compared w/other features in 2006 (in part, b/c of people not being conditioned to looking at that many brown people for that long). He seems smart enough to balance his thoughtful work w/the H&K type of fluff w/o demeaning himself. Human construct or not, race is still a device that many buy into and therefore, can't be ignored.

bad article

I thought this article was too naive. The characters of Harold and Kumar are all seen as "mostly white/heavily assimilated" characters by the average white audience person. That's why they are accepted. How anyone can applaud acceptance of assimilated people as if it's some kind of major accomplishment is baffling to me. I'm a second-generation Chinese American who doesn't speak any Chinese, and in no way would be considered Chinese in China. It's pretty obvious to me that I can fit into white society much easier than first-generation Chinese Americans. It's also extremely obvious that first-generation Chinese Americans are discriminated against and humiliated by Americans of all kinds far more than second-generation Chinese like myself. Two thirds of all Asian Americans are FOREIGN BORN whose primary language is NOT English, and yet all Asian Americans who grew up in this country seem to care about when it comes to cinema is depicting themselves. What gives? Have most native-born Asians completely bought into the white idea that their immigrant parents are culturally inferior and deserve humiliation and disrespect? Harold and Kumar are funny movies but they don't "break any barriers" of significance, unless you think Dave Chappelle "broke barriers" with his comedy, too. Dave, by the way, broke a $40 million contract when he realized his show was too racist and that he was being a minstrel comedian for white people who wanted a way to make fun of black people.

I'm sorry but this looks

I'm sorry but this looks like the kind of creepy anti-white folks who identify strongly with H&K. I notice how you use "white" like it's a pejorative rather than a descriptive. White people aren't bad. And this bit about their parents being culturally inferior to Americans. Well guess what, in China, American parents would be culturally inferior. In Italy, American parents would be culturally inferior. It's about conformity to the country, which their parents willingly immigrated to. My parents are immigrants as well, they came here in the 70's from Ireland. I consider myself American, not Irish. Ireland is where my parents are from, but I'm an American.

Good article. I don't see

Good article. I don't see what's so wrong about showing Asian-Americans as people and not stereotypes?? In regards to the comment above mine, why would Asian-Americans not want to see themselves depicted in cinema, particularly when most American films are directed by and star only white people. And Dave Chappelle's show did break barriers. It made it ok to talk about and laugh at racism (again); the show itself was not racist, unless you think acknowledging how ridiculous stereotypes are is racist. The problem Dave had was that racist people would laugh at the show without caring that it was subverting racist ideals; only because there was a silly looking minority. To save his sense of integrity, he walked away. I think Harold and Kumar is a nice departure from the "typical" representation of Asian Americans in the media as nerds, ninjas, or dudes with small penises. They're just shown as people, who happen to be of a particular race.

Asians

"In the US, the term "asian" usually only refers to folks who are from chinese/korean/japanese ancestry." Wow. Cultural snobbery and ethnocentrism at its worst and patently untrue. Even among white Americans, Asia and "Asian" encompass much more than that, from Southeast Asia (Vietnam, Singapore, Cambodia, Thailand, etc.) to the Pacific Islands (Philippines, Samoa, Tonga, etc.). Indians are Asians, people. Just because they don't have what many would consider the common physical characteristics of "Asians" doesn't mean that they're not. There are a number of Asian cultures, all very different from one another. There are also a number of ethnicities throughout Asia, and they don't all share the same physical characteristics. What's sad is that I know other Asians who wouldn't include Indians or Pacific Islanders under the umbrella. Feh. Snobbery bordering on racism.

poop.

poop.

Sound

"What's sad is that I know other Asians who wouldn't include Indians or Pacific Islanders under the umbrella. Feh. Snobbery bordering on racism." There does seem to be something interesting (of which I know nothing about) in the rise of the distinction in the U.S. between Asians, Pacific Islanders, and East Indians. At its basis, I think it illuminates the problematic nature of identifying "race" in an increasingly diverse gene pool, to which the only solution is to move the dialog beyond the distinction altogether. By identifying Harold and Kumar primarily in their cultural context -- as young male stoners in the U.S. -- and perhaps only secondarily by their "racial heritage", I think HKGTWC makes some progress in doing this. The author's fundamental premise is sound.

Hardly

Cheech and Chong

Human Views

First, I would like to acknowledge that there are parts of Russia that may be considered more "Asian" by some people's standards than others since the Mongolian empire reached out, touched and left it's genetic marker behind. So yes, Russia is Asian. As for race being a man made construct, that would mean that someone, somewhere is secretly changing the tones of people's skin along with other "racially" distinct features. Race is not man made, you are confusing racial differences with racism and that is very racist. The differences in apperance, culture and ethnicity is something that should be celebrated because we all know that variety is the spice of life. Acknowledging that someone has a different heritage is not innately evil. The evil part comes into play when people see only the differences and base opinions and reactions on those differences without pausing to see that a different culture with different values is still a human culture. Here in the states we like to lump everybody into these different categories. Asian, European (which somehow, Australian falls under), African, Martian, Antarctican...you get the point. But for most of us it's not an assessment done on the grounds of belittling a different culture but to understand and embrace the difference. I was raised in a mixed household within a culturally diverse neighborhood and I wasn't affraid to acknowledge the differences because again, they should be celebrated. Harold and Kumar is bar-none my all time favorite comedy. Yes, the leads are Asian much like I am European but Harold and Kumar are no less American. Neither character portrays the "typical movie foreigner" because they aren't foreign. These are the guys I went to school with. Work with. Partied with. But to leave out the fact that they are Asian negates their heritage and I won't do that. Whites in the United States aren't classified as European Americans because it's a given. In some ways it's good but really, it makes us forget that our families started somewhere else with different values. We lose part of that since of ancestry. The article was right about breaking ground but wrong about the ground it broke and that is the fact that looking past the skin tones eye shapes Harold and Kumar are typical American's with typical American values. Rolls that up until then was given to Whitey McBland. Typical American's are of every creed and type. Who doesn't love a good White Castle hamburger after all?

Jeez

Most of you need to relax and just take the film for what it is, its a comedy that did break minor barriers, nothing extreme was broken because you dont see the leads on cbs or nbc talking about what the film did for their races. Baby steps need to be taken for bigger ones to happen, this was a baby step, in my opinion racism is the product of people who need to learn to tolerate, and here in America we have been raised on the fact that we are better than everyone else and that everyone needs us. Im a white guy and yeah i know all the stereotypes and there is a reason why they are there, because they are mostly true, so what is so bad about making fun of the truth, especially if it gets things moving in the right direction to stop it? All of you are so busy arguing that you dont realize that they are completely mocking white society as well, almost all of the stereotypes come from white guys like me and in the movie all of the problems started with a white guy instigating it and Kumar not taking it. it seems a lot of the Asian people are mad at this film, but if you really look into it, the snobish and so called "white authority" should be mad at it, because the films are true. yeah all the acts in the movies are extreme, but how it all started in the films is definitely not extreme, these are things that happen, this is just making fun of it to hopefully fix it. ever heard that if you cant laugh at the truth then you can never fix it? this is a perfect example.

Anti-White racism in this film

I feel the same way, and seeing that my two of my best friends are Korean-American and Indian-American, I asked them wtf?? when they saw it. We grew up in New Jersey and I had to ask them did they ever face racism from white people like in the movie. The movie was racist as hell, all the white men were A) trouble makers B) idiots or inbred perverts all the white women were A) sluts and repressed wives B) despicable druggies. So while the protagonists got laughs and cheers the white foils were laughed at. White people were treated like crap in the movie. For the Asian-American guys who are going to say "well Asians are treated worse in American cinema" PLEASE give examples other than long duk dong from nearly 30 years ago--didn't he at least get the girl at the end??--or the Joy Luck Club, another movie that came out what 17 years ago?

Not all the white people in the movie are like that!

Look at NPH. He the cool white guy that busts harold and kumar out of there sticky situations. Plus in the movie he gets all the ladies.....in bed. So relax Harold and Kumar is not a racist flick just a movie knocking down stereotypes.

@jcostello

Whether or not these movies you mention happened 30 yrs ago is irrelevant. They ARE far worse than any treatment whites have gotten in movies. There will always be enough movies to outweigh the negative stereotypes of whites in Harold and Kumar. EXAMPLES OF NEGATIVE ASIAN PORTRAYALS: 1)The Hangover (2009) -Ken Jeong plays Mr Chow, a gay Asian gangster who speaks with a bad foreign accent. In one full frontal nudity scene, he pops out of a car trunk and flashes his 1" penis. 2)Gran Torino (2008) -Eastwood uses all the racist slurs known against asians; asian males are depicted as either weak and slavelike (Charlie Chan) or evil (Hmong gang) 3)Hancock (2008) -Will Smith lifts up the SUV and says "konnichiwa" to 3 Korean guys in a car when they're not even Japanese. And when they respond he says "oh, now you speak Enrisheee." 4)Pirates of the Carribean: At Worlds End (2007) -Asians depicted as chauvanistic, ugly, small 5)Van Wilder (2002) -In the first scene, it appears that Wilder is receiving a blowjob from an older Asian woman he calls "Sukmi." One of his sidekicks is a nerdy Indian character named Taj Mahal Badalandabad who speaks English with a "funny" accent. 6)Heroes (series) -Hiro and Ando (Masi Oka, James Lee) are a couple of nerdy Japanese guys. They are also the only male characters who have never gotten laid. Source: http://www.modelminority.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Media%20Portrayals Why doesn't someone name at least 5 examples of movies where asians are positively portrayed in a major role, in nonstereotypical ways? As of 2009 you can't, period.

That's such a load of

That's such a load of garbage. Whites are portrayed badly in a TON of movies, and in many of the ones you listed, asians are also portrayed positively. And like the guy said, you're bringing up stuff that came out 20, 30 and 60 years ago!! Whites are being degraded in movies made in the here and now. Don't even dare start saying Whites are portraying you poorly, because the truth of the matter is that it's Whites who are being ripped on. Back it up with some proof.

Technically...

If you live on the continent of Asia, you are Asian. Just like Germans and the French are both Europeans. Being Asian doesn't entail you have slanted eyes. Just like being European doesn't mean you enjoy tea and crumpets versus wine and cheese. It's the same thing. There isn't a magical continent in between the other two just because people in one country look different from eachother. Technically, Mexicans are American as they live on the continent of America. As are Cubans. Americans don't understand this notion because we are an inappriopriately named country. USA is nothing more than a short description of what we are. People forget we are the United States OF America. People say "God Bless America" and show only the stars and bars, but that would cover our country, Canada, Mexico, and all of South America. In the usual "God Bless America" context, you should technically be saying "God Bless the United States". Kumar is Asian. If you want to argue that point, you're uninformed and unintelligent, or you should take about five seconds to think about what you're going to say before you post it on a public forum.

haha asian means anybody who

haha asian means anybody who looks like a chink. I would know. I saw that Indians are Asians, but my Indian friends and I refer to each other as Indians and Asians. I would also probably refer to Russians as Russians or white, since they are mostly white.

I'm not one to be easily

I'm not one to be easily offended, but this was one of the most hateful movies I've ever seen in my life. Nearly every scene revolved around the degradation of a white male and his incompetence in every aspect, showcasing every stereotype imaginable. If the roles were reversed this movie would be branded hate-speech. Its not hard to read between the lines and see the true intent upon which this film was made. Watching this movie made me feel like I was being vomited upon again, and again, and again. Not to mention the movie just isn't funny, every scene revolves around anti-white prejudice in an attempt to insert at least some level of humor since the 2 main actors are incapable of that feat.

Maybe it was Karma that Kal

Maybe it was Karma that Kal Penn was robbed in D.C. and the cop who helped him afterward was white. I hope he thinks about that when he's making Harold and Kumar 3!

anti-white racism... nobody cares

seriously, this movie (which I concede was pretty hilarious) manages to make every SINGLE white character an oppressor, a bigot, a rapist, a sadist, an idiot or just inferior in some way to peaceable blacks, magnanimous south Americans and worshipful arabs and asians... Scarcely a single white character has any positive qualities whatsoever... White women are portrayed as pretty baubles, unpaid whores or undignified "pride and joy of the white oppressor", part of the point of this movie is defiling white women... nobody will comment on this of course. and nobody cares. and no white special interest group will voice their concerns (because none exist)... does anybody else see the profound double standard here?

@ crackerjack

in all fairness, most movies have done a far worse disservice to asians. asians are almost always depicted as chauvanists, nerdy, or evil whenever there is a white protagonist. the typical protagonist roles asians have been casted in are martial artists that never get the girl. many people in this society don't come into contact with many asians (eg. southerners, midwesterners) and these movies literally define their image of all asians. on the other hand, Harold + Kumar is just ONE movie that depicts all whites as "oppressors, bigots, etc." but most people already know not all whites are like this because whites are everywhere and the majority are not like this (at least not on the outside). so no, this is not a double standard.

Are you kidding me? The real

Are you kidding me? The real problem for Asians is being underrepresented in movies. NOT being portrayed negatively. Whites are constantly being belittled, maligned and degraded to a huge degree.

Sure Harold and Kumar is racist to

Harold and Kumar is racist to white, all the white male are either dumb or retarded, ugly or bastard in this 2 movies. Only the color people are portait has cool! This movie is a big manipulation of the masses vehiculatinmg the same consistent imag.e of the white male. Pitty because the movie is entertaining.

kal penn is a nitwit and a traitor

I'd like to point out that the directors of Harold & kumar are jewish and they used the lead actors in a way to push their agenda. In our county one wouldn't be allowed to make such movie ( as nudity & denigration of women are not allowed in mainstream movies). kal penn is a nitwit and a traitor. He doesn't represent our values or culture (or else where would you find a Indian lead actor taking such degrading roles in fully Indian movie). We have salman khan, shah rukh khan and many others in our county who have never taken a role like the one kal penn did.

Well those people who wrote

Well those people who wrote it are seem to have an agenda to degrade white people as well. It's disgusting what they did.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can insert image and video nodes using [nodeinsert nid=55 align=left]

More information about formatting options

Follow Adam Quigley on...

Twitter Updates

    Hear Adam Quigley Live MONDAY NIGHTS at 6 PM PST / 9 PM EST

    And check out back-episodes of the /Filmcast here!